Jonesing on Nonprofits

Jonesing on Nonprofits

Share this post

Jonesing on Nonprofits
Jonesing on Nonprofits
Updates on OpenAI (c)(3) Conversion to Public Benefit Status

Updates on OpenAI (c)(3) Conversion to Public Benefit Status

Musk sought majority for-profit control of OpenAI to fund Mars Colony

darryll k. jones's avatar
darryll k. jones
Apr 24, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Jonesing on Nonprofits
Jonesing on Nonprofits
Updates on OpenAI (c)(3) Conversion to Public Benefit Status
Share
How Elon Musk and SpaceX Plan to Colonize Mars - The New York Times

A group of “experts in law, corporate governance, artificial intelligence, nonprofit organizations” and some former OpenAI employees has submitted an extremely comprehensive and well-crafted open letter to the California and Delaware Attorneys General. The 29-page letter reads like a sophisticated brief. The group asks the AGs to oppose OpenAI’s sale of its Microsoft joint venture to a public benefit corporation. Meanwhile, Sam Altman and OpenAI submitted a counterclaim1 in the Musk v. Altman with some interesting assertions and a bit more explanation for why the “capped profit” entity – allowing for 10,000% ROI to private investors – is nevertheless insufficient to the accomplishment of the charitable purpose. Finally, the California AG recently declined2 to grant “relator” status to Elon Musk. Doing so, would have allowed to sue Sam Altman and Open AI in the name of the State. In effect, it would have deputized Musk to act on behalf of California.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Jonesing on Nonprofits to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Darryll K. Jones
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share